Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verschuren, F.
Right arrow Articles by Reynaert, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verschuren, F.
Right arrow Articles by Reynaert, M.
(Chest. 2004;125:841-850.)
© 2004 American College of Chest Physicians

Volumetric Capnography as a Screening Test for Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department*

Franck Verschuren, MD; Giuseppe Liistro, MD; René Coffeng; Frédéric Thys, MD; Jean Roeseler, CPT; Francis Zech, MD and Marc Reynaert, MD

* From the Departments of Emergency and Intensive Care (Drs. Verschuren, Thys, Zech, and Reynaert, and Mr. Roeseler), and Pneumology (Dr. Liistro), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium; and Datex-Ohmeda Division of Instrumentarium Corp (Mr. Coffeng), Helsinki, Finland.

Correspondence to: Franck Verschuren, MD, Service des Urgences, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Ave Hippocrate 10, B-1200 Bruxelles, Belgium; e-mail: Franck.verschuren{at}clin.ucl.ac.be

Study objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of volumetric capnography (VCap), which is the plot of the expired CO2 partial pressure against the expired volume during a single breath, with the PaCO2 to end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) gradient, in the case of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).

Design: Single-center, prospective study.

Setting: Emergency department of a teaching hospital.

Patients: A total of 45 outpatients with positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay d-dimer levels of > 500 ng/mL. The diagnosis of PE was confirmed in 18 outpatients according to a validated procedure based on the ventilation-perfusion lung scan and/or spiral CT scanning.

Interventions: Curves of VCap were obtained from a compact monitor connected to a computer. A sequence of four to six stable breaths allowed the calculation of the following several variables: alveolar dead space fraction; the ratio of alveolar dead space (VDalv) to airway dead space (VDaw); the VDalv to physiologic dead space (VDphys) fraction; the slope of phase 3; and the late dead space fraction (Fdlate) corresponding to the extrapolation of the capnographic curve to a volume of 15% of the predicted total lung capacity.

Results: The mean (± SD) PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient was 5.3 ± 0.7 mm Hg in the PE-positive group and 2.8 ± 0.7 mm Hg in the PE-negative group (p = 0.019). Four variables of the VCap exhibited a statistical difference between both groups, as follows: the VDalv/VDaw fraction; the slope of phase 3; the VDalv/VDphys fraction; and the Fdlate, which was 8.2 ± 3.3% vs -7.7 ± 2.8%, respectively (p = 0.000011). The diagnostic performance expressed as the mean area under a receiver operating characteristic curve comparison was 75.9 ± 7.4% for the PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient and 87.6 ± 4.9% for the Fdlate (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Fdlate, a variable of VCap, had a statistically better diagnostic performance in suspected PE than the PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient. VCap is a promising computer-assisted bedside application of pulmonary pathophysiology. Future research should define the place of this technique in the diagnostic workup of PE, especially in the presence of positive d-dimers.

Key Words: CO2 • emergency department • pulmonary embolism • volumetric capnography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
U. Lucangelo, F. Bernabe, S. Vatua, G. Degrassi, A. Villagra, R. Fernandez, P. V. Romero, P. Saura, M. Borelli, and L. Blanch
Prognostic Value of Different Dead Space Indices in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Lung Injury and ARDS
Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 62 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. Hogg, D. Dawson, T. Tabor, B. Tabor, and K. Mackway-Jones
Respiratory Dead Space Measurement in the Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism in Outpatients With Pleuritic Chest Pain
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2195 - 2202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
Y. Tang, M. J. Turner, and A. B. Baker
Effects of alveolar dead-space, shunt and V/Q distribution on respiratory dead-space measurements
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2005; 95(4): 538 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians.