|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences (Drs. Johansson and Ställberg), Uppsala University, Uppsala; AstraZeneca Research and Development, Lund; (Drs. Tornling and Berggen), AstraZeneca Sweden (Dr. Karlsson and Ms. Andersson), Södertälje; KW Partners (Mr. Fält), Stockholm, Sweden.
Correspondence to: Gunnar Johansson, MD, PhD, Nyby Vårdcentral, Vårdcentral, Heidenstamsgatan 69, S-754 27 Uppsala, Sweden; e-mail: gunnar.johansson{at}lul.se
Objective: Assessment of patient preferences for attributes of asthma treatments.
Methods: Two hundred ninety-eight patients (age range, 18 to 60 years) from 15 centers in Sweden completed a questionnaire concerning their asthma, and ranked 18 alternative treatments using conjoint analysis. Patients were receiving treatment with either inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and short-acting bronchodilator (n = 123) or ICS and long-acting bronchodilator (separate inhalers, n = 87; combination inhaler, n = 88). Attributes analyzed were maintenance treatment, additional reliever, time to onset and duration of reliever, number of symptom-free days (SFDs) per month, and out-of-pocket cost per month.
Results: Conjoint analysis showed that the most important aspect of treatment was SFD. Forty percent of the patients had
15 SFDs per month. Eighty-five percent of the patients preferred another treatment over their current treatment. Treatment preferences were heterogeneous, and in 78% were not covered by current treatment guidelines. A total of 148 patients (50%) preferred a combination inhaler to separate inhalers, and 233 patients (78%) preferred a reliever that is both rapid and long acting. The most preferred treatment was a combination inhaler for maintenance and reliever use. On average, the patients were willing to pay an additional 328 Swedish krona [US $36] per month for the change to the preferred treatment.
Conclusion: SFDs were the most important attribute in asthma treatment. Patients were willing to pay for a switch to their preferred treatment. The most favored treatments were a reliever therapy that is both rapid and long acting and a combination inhaler for both maintenance and as-needed use.
Key Words: asthma treatment conjoint analysis treatment preferences
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. M. Osman and M. E. Hyland Patient needs and medication styles in COPD Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2005; 14(96): 89 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Haughney, M. R. Partridge, C. Vogelmeier, T. Larsson, R. Kessler, E. Stahl, R. Brice, and C-G. Lofdahl Exacerbations of COPD: quantifying the patient's perspective using discrete choice modelling Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2005; 26(4): 623 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Berti, G. Longo, S. Visintin, B. A. Chowdhury, C. R. Jenkins, G. B. Marks, H. K. Reddel, D. K.C. Lee, A. Raghupathy, B. Brashier, et al. Treatment of Mild Asthma N. Engl. J. Med., July 28, 2005; 353(4): 424 - 427. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gaga, N. Papageorgiou, E. Zervas, D. Gioulekas, and S. Konstantopoulos Control of Asthma Under Specialist Care: Is It Achieved? Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 78 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |