Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cullinane, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Grannis, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cullinane, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Grannis, F. W., Jr
(Chest. 2004;125:1328-1334.)
© 2004 American College of Chest Physicians

Prognostic Factors in the Surgical Management of Pericardial Effusion in the Patient With Concurrent Malignancy*

Carey A. Cullinane, MD; I. Benjamin Paz, MD; David Smith, PhD; Nora Carter, MA and Frederic W. Grannis, Jr, MD, FCCP

* From the Section of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery (Dr. Grannis), Division of General Oncologic Surgery (Drs. Cullinane and Paz), and Department of Biostatistics (Dr. Smith and Ms. Carter), City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Correspondence to: Frederic W. Grannis, Jr., MD, FCCP, Department of Surgery, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010; e-mail: fgrannis{at}coh.org

Background: Pericardial effusion in the patient with cancer presents a unique management problem. Although multiple methods of operative and nonoperative drainage of pericardial effusions have been described, surgical pericardial window remains the standard approach to long-term drainage. Selecting the patient who may benefit from an operative approach presents a difficult challenge. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcome of 63 consecutive patients with malignancy who underwent surgical pericardial window for symptomatic pericardial effusion between January 1, 1990, and July 1, 2001, at City of Hope National Medical Center in order to try to determine whether the type of cancer, the presence of malignant cells in pericardial fluid, or tissue specimens or the method of surgery influenced the incidence of recurrent pericardial effusion or duration of survival.

Methods: The cohort was comprised of 15 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 22 patients with breast cancer, 17 patients with hematologic malignancy, and 9 patients with other solid tumors. Pertinent clinical, laboratory, hospital stay, and outcome data including long-term follow-up were recorded. Patients were followed up until the time of last clinical follow-up or death. Univariate survival analyses were performed to determine significant clinical factors contributing to outcome.

Results: Median follow-up was 6.6 months for the group and 8.3 months for those alive at last follow-up. Median survival rates for patients with lung, breast, hematologic, and other solid-tumor malignancies were 3.2 months, 8.8 months, 17 months, and 16.4 months, respectively. Preoperative factors that negatively correlated with survival included a diagnosis of NSCLC (p = 0.0014), the presence of a pleural effusion (p = 0.003), or positive pathologic (p = 0.02) or cytologic findings (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: A surgical approach to pericardial drainage is effective (< 5% failure rate) and provides an opportunity for continued therapy with the potential for relief of dyspnea and improvement in quality of life and survival in selected patients.

Key Words: cardiac tamponade • malignancy • palliative surgery • pericardial effusion • pericardial window




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. L. Gross, R. N. Younes, D. Deheinzelin, A. L. Diniz, R. A. da Silva, and F. J. Haddad
Surgical Management of Symptomatic Pericardial Effusion in Patients with Solid Malignancies
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 13(12): 1732 - 1738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. K.H. O'Brien, J. C. Kucharczuk, M. B. Marshall, J. S. Friedberg, Z. Chen, L. R. Kaiser, and J. B. Shrager
Comparative Study of Subxiphoid Versus Video-Thoracoscopic Pericardial "Window"
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2013 - 2019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. L. Gornik, M. Gerhard-Herman, and J. A. Beckman
Abnormal Cytology Predicts Poor Prognosis in Cancer Patients With Pericardial Effusion
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2005; 23(22): 5211 - 5216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Uribe-Etxebarria, R. Voces, M. A. Rodriguez, A. Llorente, P. Perez, and J. I. Aramendi
Reversible Tricuspid Valve Stenosis Due to a Metastatic Dissemination of a Noncardiac Sarcoma
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 80(1): e1 - e2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. M. Frankel, F. W. Grannis Jr, C. A. Cullinane, and I. B. Paz
Malignant Pericardial Effusions
Chest, November 1, 2004; 126(5): 1713 - 1713.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians.