Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turpie, A. G.G.
Right arrow Articles by Lassen, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turpie, A. G.G.
Right arrow Articles by Lassen, M. R.
(Chest. 2004;126:501-508.)
© 2004 American College of Chest Physicians

Superiority of Fondaparinux Over Enoxaparin in Preventing Venous Thromboembolism in Major Orthopedic Surgery Using Different Efficacy End Points*

Alexander G.G. Turpie, MD; Kenneth A. Bauer, MD; Bengt I. Eriksson, MD, PhD and Michael R. Lassen, MD

* From the Department of Medicine (Dr. Turpie), Hamilton Health Sciences-General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada; the Department of Medicine (Dr. Bauer), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA; the Orthopaedics Department (Dr. Eriksson), Sahlgrenska University Hospital/ÖSTRA, Göte-borg, Sweden; and the Department of Orthopaedics (Dr. Lassen), University Hospital of Copenhagen Hillerød, Hillerød, Denmark.

Correspondence to: Alexander G.G. Turpie, MD, Department of Medicine, Hamilton Health Sciences-General Hospital, 237 Barton St East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada; e-mail: turpiea{at}mcmaster.ca

Study objectives: To assess the relevance of various efficacy end points established for thromboprophylaxis trials, we compared the results of the fondaparinux phase III program in major orthopedic surgery using the original primary efficacy end point with those obtained when the efficacy end points recently suggested by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy and the European Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) were used.

Setting and patients: Fondaparinux was compared with enoxaparin in four multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials of major orthopedic surgery. The original primary efficacy end point consisted of a composite of deep-vein thrombosis detected by mandatory bilateral venography, documented symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism up to day 11. The efficacy end point established by the ACCP Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy comprises any proximal deep-vein thrombosis, symptomatic proven deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or fatal pulmonary embolism, and that established by the European CPMP comprises any proximal deep-vein thrombosis, symptomatic proven pulmonary embolism, or death from any cause.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either subcutaneous fondaparinux (2.5 mg once daily) starting postoperatively or approved enoxaparin regimens.

Results: Using the original end point of the fondaparinux studies, the incidence of venous thromboembolism was 13.7% (371 of 2,703 patients) in the enoxaparin group compared with 6.8% (182 of 2,682 patients) in the fondaparinux group, with a common odds reduction of 55.2% (p = 10–17; 95% confidence interval, 45.8% to 63.1%) in favor of fondaparinux. The respective incidences of efficacy end points with enoxaparin and fondaparinux were 3.3% and 1.7%, respectively, according to the ACCP definition, and 3.9% and 2.1%, respectively, according to the CPMP definition. The common odds reduction in favor of fondaparinux was 49.6% (p < 0.001) and 48.0% (p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions: Fondaparinux was consistently more effective than enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, irrespective of the established composite outcomes used.

Key Words: clinical trial • factor Xa inhibitors • fondaparinux • low-molecular-weight heparins • major orthopedic surgery • Org31540/SR90107 • pentasaccharide • thromboprophylaxis • venography • venous thromboembolism




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LupusHome page
N Wiles and B J Hunt
Anticoagulation via anti-Factor Xa inhibition
Lupus, March 1, 2006; 15(3): 167 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians.