Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steinshamn, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bjermer, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steinshamn, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bjermer, L.
(Chest. 2004;126:1154-1160.)
© 2004 American College of Chest Physicians

Effects of Montelukast and Salmeterol on Physical Performance and Exercise Economy in Adult Asthmatics With Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction*

Sigurd Steinshamn, MD, PhD; Mariann Sandsund, PhD; Malcolm Sue-Chu, MD, PhD and Leif Bjermer, MD, PhD, FCCP

* From the Department of Lung Medicine (Drs. Steinshamn, Sue-Chu, and Bjermer), University Hospital of Trondheim; and Department of Health and Work Physiology (Dr. Sandsund), SINTEF Health Research, Trondheim, Norway.

Correspondence to: Sigurd Steinshamn, MD, PhD, Department of Lung Medicine, Heart and Lung Institute, University Hospital of Trondheim, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway; e-mail address: sigurd.steinshamn{at}medisin.ntnu.no

Study objectives: To compare the effect of montelukast and the long-acting ß2-agonist salmeterol on cardiopulmonary exercise economy and physical performance in adult patients with asthma during exercise.

Design and patients: Asthmatic patients (n = 18), aged 18 to 35 years with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), using a double-blind, double-dummy cross-over design. Montelukast, 10 mg/d, was compared to inhaled salmeterol, 50 µg bid. The study medication was administered for at least 5 days prior to testing, with a washout period of at least 5 days. Treadmill exercise tests (5.3% inclination, – 15°C ambient temperature) were performed at work loads of 80% of maximal oxygen uptake (O2max) [6 min], rest (4 min), 60% of O2max (6 min), and finally step increments until exhaustion.

Measurements and results: We investigated parameters of gas exchange, physical performance, and lung function. After montelukast, the oxygen pulse was higher than after salmeterol, at 80% of O2max (p = 0.035), and 6 min at 60% of O2max (p = 0.011). Lung function during exercise, running time to exhaustion, Borg score, lactate levels, O2max, carbon dioxide elimination, minute ventilation, ventilatory equivalents, respiratory exchange ratio, and heart rate were not significantly different between the two treatments. The maximal postexercise fall in FEV1 from baseline occurred 2 min after run to exhaustion, and was greater after salmeterol than after montelukast: mean, 16.2% (SD, 11.0) vs 10.0% (SD, 12.2) [p < 0.001].

Conclusions: In adult asthmatics with EIB, montelukast may have a more favorable effect on the oxygen pulse, thus suggesting improved gas exchange during exercise.

Key Words: asthma • exercise economy • exercise-induced bronchoconstriction • gas exchange • lung function • montelukast • physical performance • salmeterol




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Philip, D. S. Pearlman, C. Villaran, C. Legrand, T. Loeys, R. B. Langdon, and T. F. Reiss
Single-Dose Montelukast or Salmeterol as Protection Against Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3): 875 - 883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians.