Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zafar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rapoport, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zafar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rapoport, D. M.
(Chest. 2005;127:80-88.)
© 2005 American College of Chest Physicians

Choice of Oximeter Affects Apnea-Hypopnea Index*

Subooha Zafar, MD; Indu Ayappa, PhD; Robert G. Norman, PhD; Ana C. Krieger, MD, FCCP; Joyce A. Walsleben, PhD and David M. Rapoport, MD, FCCP

* From the New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.

Correspondence to: David M. Rapoport, MD, FCCP, Department of Medicine, New York University Medical Center, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016; e-mail david.rapoport{at}med.nyu.edu

Study objectives: Current Medicare guidelines include an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15 events per hour, in which all hypopneas must be associated with 4% desaturation, to qualify for reimbursement for therapy with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The present data demonstrate the effect of pulse oximeter differences on AHI.

Design: Prospective study, blinded analysis.

Setting: Academic sleep disorder center.

Patients: One hundred thirteen consecutive patients (84 men and 29 women) undergoing diagnostic sleep studies and being evaluated for CPAP based on the Medicare indications for reimbursement.

Interventions: Patients had two of four commonly used oximeters with signal averaging times of 4 to 6 s placed on different digits of the same hand during nocturnal polysomnography.

Measurements and results: Apneas and candidate hypopneas (amplitude reduction, > 30%) were scored from the nasal cannula airflow signal without reference to oximetry. Candidate hypopneas then were reclassified as hypopneas by each oximeter if they were associated with a 4% desaturation. Although the use of three oximeters resulted in a similar AHI (bias, < 1 event per hour), the fourth oximeter showed an overall increase in AHI of 3.7 events per hour. This caused 7 of 113 patients to have an AHI of ≥ 15 events per hour (meeting the Medicare criteria for treatment) by one oximeter but not when a different oximeter was used. More importantly, when our analysis was limited to those patients whose number of candidate hypopneas made them susceptible to the threshold value of 15 events per hour, 7 of 35 patients who did not meet the Medicare AHI standard for treatment by one oximeter were reclassified when a different oximeter was used.

Conclusion: In the present study, oximeter choice affected whether the AHI reached the critical cutoff of 15 events per hour, particularly in those with disease severity that was neither very mild nor very severe. As oximetry is not a technique that produces a generic result, there are significant limitations to basing the definition of hypopnea on a fixed percentage of desaturation in determining the eligibility for CPAP therapy.

Key Words: Medicare • obstructive sleep apnea • oximetry • sleep apnea syndromes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
L. K. Brown
Autotitrating CPAP: How Shall We Judge Safety and Efficacy of a "Black Box"?
Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 312 - 314.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Chest Physicians.