Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blot, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blot, F.
(Chest. 2005;127:1347-1352.)
© 2005 American College of Chest Physicians

Indications, Timing, and Techniques of Tracheostomy in 152 French ICUs*

François Blot, MD; Christian Melot, MD, PhD, MscBiostat; for the Commission d’Epidémiologie et de Recherche Clinique{dagger}

* From the Commission d’Epidémiologie et de Recherche Clinique of the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française, Villejuif, France. {dagger} A list of members of Commission d’Epidémiologie et de Recherche Clinique is located in the Appendix.

Correspondence to: François Blot, MD, Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France; e-mail: blot{at}igr.fr

Study objectives: To investigate the current practice of tracheostomy in French ICUs, focusing on the frequency, timing, indications, and techniques.

Design: A retrospective study.

Setting: A questionnaire was sent to all ICUs included in the national registry of the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française.

Patients: All ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) during the year preceding the survey (excluding noninvasive ventilation) were covered by the questionnaire.

Intervention: None.

Measurements and results: Of the 708 ICUs invited to participate, 152 (21.5%) answered the questionnaire. Overall, 35,322 patients (median, 212 patients per unit; interquartile range [IQR], 148 to 329 patients) had received MV, including one fourth of patients for > 7 days. A median of 7.2% of patients (IQR, 2.9 to 11.1%) had undergone a tracheostomy. The most frequently reported indications for tracheostomy were prolonged MV (95%, after a median of 20 days) and failure of extubation (48%). An indication for "early" tracheostomy (ie, < 3 weeks) was considered in 68% of the ICUs, after a median time of 7 days. Physicians thought that performing tracheostomy would facilitate weaning from MV and early oral nutrition, and would improve overall patient comfort. The main disadvantages listed were tracheal complications, the aggressiveness of the procedure, and the risk of infection. Surgical techniques largely remained preferred compared to percutaneous techniques.

Conclusions: There is much heterogeneity in the reported practices of tracheostomy in French ICUs. Three fourths of physicians considered that a randomized study comparing prolonged translaryngeal intubation and early tracheostomy in patients expected to receive prolonged MV would be necessary to clarify those issues.

Key Words: ICU • mechanical ventilation • tracheostomy






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Chest Physicians.