HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mismetti, P. Articles by Laporte, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mismetti, P. Articles by Laporte, S.

Enoxaparin in the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis With or Without Pulmonary Embolism^*

An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

^* From the Thrombosis Research Group (Drs. Mismetti, Decousus, and Laporte, and Ms. Quenet), Clinical Pharmacology Department, University Hospital Bellevue, Saint-Etienne, France; Department of Medicine (Dr. Levine), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Division of Internal Medicine (Dr. Merli), Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; and Laboratoire Aventis (Mr. Derobert), Paris, France.

Correspondence to: Sara Quenet, MS, Thrombosis Research Group, Clinical Pharmacology Department, University Hospital Bellevue, F-42055 Saint-Etienne, France; e-mail: sara.quenet{at}chu-st-etienne.fr

Study objectives: Low-molecular-weight heparins have been compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) for treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, a comparison of their efficacy in the presence or absence of pulmonary embolism (PE) has not been studied. We estimated the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin vs UFH in patients with proximal DVT with/without symptomatic PE using a meta-analysis of individual data from randomized controlled trials.

Design and setting: Randomized controlled trials were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, abstracts from international meetings on venous thromboembolism (VTE), previous meta-analyses, and trial data provided by the sponsor.

Participants: For inclusion, randomized controlled trials had to be properly randomized; include patients with objectively diagnosed DVT; compare enoxaparin twice daily with UFH; use objective methods to assess recurrent symptomatic VTE, major bleeding, and death at 3 months; and include blind evaluation of clinical events.

Measurements: A meta-analysis was performed using the logarithm of the relative risk (RR) method. Enoxaparin in DVT treatment with/without symptomatic PE was considered noninferior to UFH for preventing VTE at 3 months if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the RR (enoxaparin/UFH) was lower than a prespecified noninferiority margin (1.61). No increase in major bleeding or mortality should be observed.

Results: The meta-analysis included individual data from three randomized controlled trials (749 patients and 754 patients in the enoxaparin and UFH groups, respectively). The observed RR (enoxaparin/UFH) of VTE was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.26) for the intention-to-treat population (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.13; for per-protocol analysis). Results did not differ for patients with clinical PE (235 patients; RR, 0.84) and without clinical PE (1,268 patients; RR, 0.71), with a nonsignificant heterogeneity test between groups (p = 0.76). A trend in favor of enoxaparin was observed for reduced mortality and major bleeding.

Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of enoxaparin vs UFH for DVT treatment is not modified by the presence of symptomatic PE.

Key Words: deep vein thrombosis • enoxaparin • low-molecular-weight heparin • meta-analysis • noninferiority • pulmonary embolism • unfractionated heparin

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Edwards Fixed-Dose Unfractionated Heparin vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism JAMA, January 17, 2007; 297(3): 262 - 262. [Full Text] [PDF]