Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duscha, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kraus, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duscha, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kraus, W. E.
(Chest. 2005;128:2788-2793.)
© 2005 American College of Chest Physicians

Effects of Exercise Training Amount and Intensity on Peak Oxygen Consumption in Middle-Age Men and Women at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease*

Brian D. Duscha, MS; Cris A. Slentz, PhD; Johanna L. Johnson, MS; Joseph A. Houmard, PhD; Daniel R. Bensimhon, MD; Kenneth J. Knetzger, MS and William E. Kraus, MD

* From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (Mr. Duscha, Ms. Johnson, Mr. Knetzger, and Drs. Slentz and Bensimhon) and Division of Cell Biology (Dr. Kraus), Duke University Medical Center, Durham; and Department of Exercise and Sports Science and Human Performance Laboratory (Dr. Houmard), East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.

Correspondence to: Brian D. Duscha, MS, Duke University Medical Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Box 3022, Durham, NC 27710; e-mail: dusch001{at}mc.duke.edu

Study objectives: Although increasing aerobic fitness by exercise training is advocated as part of a healthy lifestyle, studies examining the different effects of intensity and amount on peak consumption (O2) remain sparse.

Design: This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of three different exercise regimens differing in amount and intensity on fitness improvements.

Participants: Overweight men and women with mild-to-moderate dyslipidemia were recruited.

Interventions: The exercise groups were as follows: (1) low amount/ moderate intensity (LAMI, n = 25), the caloric equivalent of walking 19 kilometers (km)/wk at 40 to 55% of peak O2; (2) low amount/high intensity (LAHI, n = 36), the equivalent of jogging 19 km/wk at 65 to 80% of peak O2; (3) high amount/high intensity (HAHI, n = 35), the equivalent of jogging 32 km/wk at 65 to 80% of peak O2; and (4) a control group (n = 37).

Measurements and results: Peak O2 and time to exhaustion (TTE) were tested before and after 7 to 9 months of training. All exercise groups increased peak O2 and TTE compared to baseline (p ≤ 0.001). Improvements in peak O2 were greater in the LAHI and HAHI groups compared to the control group (p < 0.02); HAHI group improvements were greater than the LAMI group (p < 0.02) and the LAHI group (p < 0.02). Increased TTE for all exercise groups was higher compared to the control group (p < 0.001)

Conclusions: Exercising at a level of 19 km/wk at 40 to 55% of peak O2 is sufficient to increase aerobic fitness levels, and increasing either exercise intensity or the amount beyond these parameters will yield additional separate and combined effects on markers of aerobic fitness. Therefore, it is appropriate to recommend mild exercise to improve fitness and reduce cardiovascular risk yet encourage higher intensities and amounts for additional benefit.

Key Words: cardiovascular risk • dose response • exercise • peak oxygen consumption






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Chest Physicians.