Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Costa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Conti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Costa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Conti, G.
(Chest. 2005;128:2984-2990.)
© 2005 American College of Chest Physicians

Physiologic Evaluation of Different Levels of Assistance During Noninvasive Ventilation Delivered Through a Helmet*

Roberta Costa, MD; Paolo Navalesi, MD; Massimo Antonelli, MD; Franco Cavaliere, MD; Andrea Craba, MD; Rodolfo Proietti, MD and Giorgio Conti, MD

* From the Dipartimento di Anestesia e Rianimazione (Drs. Costa, Antonelli, Cavaliere, Craba, Proietti, and Conti), Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome; and Pneumologia riabilitativa e Terapia Intensiva Respiratoria (Dr. Navalesi), Fondazione S. Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.

Correspondence to: Giorgio Conti, MD, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; e-mail: g.conti{at}rm.unicatt.it

Objective: To evaluate the effects of various levels of pressure support (PS) during noninvasive ventilation delivered through a helmet on breathing pattern, inspiratory effort, CO2 rebreathing, and comfort.

Design: Physiologic study.

Setting: University-affiliated hospital.

Patients and participants: Eight healthy volunteers.

Interventions: Volunteers received ventilation through a helmet with four different PS/positive end-expiratory pressure combinations (5/5 cm H2O, 10/5 cm H2O, 15/5 cm H2O, and 10/10 cm H2O) applied in random order.

Measurements and results: The ventilatory respiratory rate, esophageal respiratory rate (RRpes), airway pressure, esophageal pressure tracings, esophageal swing, and pressure-time product (PTP) [PTP per breath, PTP per minute, and PTP per liter] were evaluated. We also measured the partial pressure of inspired CO2 (PiCO2) at the airway opening, mean partial pressure of expired CO2 (PeCO2), CO2 production (CO2), minute ventilation (E) delivered to the helmet (Eh), and the true inspired E. By subtracting E from Eh, we obtained the E washing the helmet (Ewh). A visual analog scale (from 0 to 10) was used to evaluate comfort. Compared to spontaneous breathing, different levels of PS progressively increased tidal volume (VT) and decreased RRpes, reducing inspiratory effort. The increased levels of assistance did not produce significant changes in PiCO2, end-tidal CO2, and CO2. PeCO2 had a slight decrease when increasing the level of PS from 5 to 10 cm H2O (p < 0.05). Despite the presence of constant values of E, the increase of PS produced an increase in Ewh, without significant differences comparing 10 cm H2O and 15 cm H2O of PS. The subjects had a slight but not significant increase in discomfort by augmenting the level of assistance. At the highest level of PS (15 cm H2O), the discomfort was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than at the other levels of assistance.

Conclusion: In volunteers, the helmet is efficient in ventilation, allowing a VT increase and RRpes reduction. A significant discomfort was present only at the highest level of assistance; however, it did not affect patient/ventilator interaction.

Key Words: CO2 rebreathing • helmet • mechanical ventilation • noninvasive ventilation • positive end-expiratory pressure






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Chest Physicians.