Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beuther, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beuther, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. J.
(Chest. 2006;129:1188-1193.)
© 2006 American College of Chest Physicians

Efficacy of a Heat Exchanger Mask in Cold Exercise-Induced Asthma*

David A. Beuther, MD and Richard J. Martin, MD, FCCP

* From the University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, CO.

Correspondence to: Richard J. Martin, MD, FCCP, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, 1400 Jackson St, Denver, CO 80206; e-mail: martinr{at}njc.org

Abstract

Study objectives: To determine the efficacy of a novel mask device in limiting cold air exercise-induced decline in lung function in subjects with a history of exercise-induced asthma (EIA).

Setting: In spite of appropriate medical therapy, many asthma patients are limited in cold weather activities.

Design: In study 1, 13 asthmatic subjects performed two randomized, single-blind treadmill exercise tests while breathing cold air (– 25 to – 15°C) through a placebo or active heat exchanger mask. In study 2, five subjects with EIA performed three treadmill exercise tests while breathing cold air: one test using the heat exchanger mask, one test without the mask but with albuterol pretreatment, and one test with neither the mask nor albuterol pretreatment (unprotected exercise). For all studies, spirometry was performed before and at 5, 15, and 30 min after exercise challenge.

Patients: For both studies, a total of 15 subjects with a history of asthma symptoms during cold air exercise were recruited.

Results: In study 1, the mean decrease (± SE) in FEV1 was 19 ± 4.9% with placebo, and 4.3 ± 1.6% with the active device (p = 0.0002). The mean decrease in maximum mid-expiratory flow (FEF25–75) was 31 ± 5.7% with placebo and 4.7 ± 1.7% with the active device (p = 0.0002). In study 2, the mean decrease in FEV1 was 6.3 ± 3.9%, 11 ± 3.7%, and 28 ± 10% for the heat exchanger mask, albuterol pretreatment, and unprotected exercises, respectively (p = 0.4375 for mask vs albuterol, p = 0.0625 for mask vs unprotected exercise). The mean decrease in FEF25–75 was 10 ± 4.8%, 23 ± 6.0%, and 36 ± 11%, respectively (p = 0.0625 for mask vs albuterol, p = 0.0625 for mask vs unprotected exercise).

Conclusions: This heat exchanger mask blocks cold exercise-induced decline in lung function at least as effectively as albuterol pretreatment.

Key Words: exercise-induced asthma • masks • protective devices • respiratory function tests






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Chest Physicians.