HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reichner, C. A. Articles by Anderson, E. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reichner, C. A. Articles by Anderson, E. D.

Outcome and Code Status of Lung Cancer Patients Admitted to the Medical ICU^*

^* From the Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.

Correspondence to: Cristina A. Reichner, MD, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, 4N Main Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007; e-mail: reichnerc{at}aol.com

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the outcome of lung cancer patients admitted to the medical ICU (MICU), to examine their code status at MICU admission and prior to death, and to determine which subspecialty physician was responsible for the change in code status.

Design: Retrospective chart review study.

Setting: A 19-bed MICU in a tertiary-care university hospital.

Patients: Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer admitted to the MICU from July 2002 to June 2004.

Measurements and main results: Forty-seven patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer accounted for 53 MICU admissions. Mean (± SD) age at MICU admission was 65 ± 10 years. Sixty-six percent were male. Eighty-three percent had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); 64% of these were stage IV NSCLC. The most common organ system implicated on MICU admission was pulmonary, with 38% of patients presenting with pneumonia. Overall MICU mortality was 43%, and in-hospital mortality was 60%. Patients who required mechanical ventilation or had more advanced lung cancer stage had the worst prognosis, with mortality rates of 74% and 68%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of patients were "full code" at MICU admission. Subsequently, the code status was changed to "do not resuscitate" in 49% of these cases. The pulmonary/critical care physician was involved in this change 96% of the time and was the sole physician in 65% of cases.

Conclusions: This study confirms that patients with lung cancer admitted to the MICU have a high mortality. Despite this, the majority of patients are full code on MICU admission. Pulmonary/critical care physicians play an important role in the end-of-life decision making of lung cancer patients admitted to the MICU, perhaps because of their availability in the MICU and also because of their sense of responsibility in maintaining and withdrawing life support.

Key Words: critical care • end of life • lung cancer • outcome

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Soares, M. Darmon, J. I. F. Salluh, C. G. Ferreira, G. Thiery, B. Schlemmer, N. Spector, and E. Azoulay Prognosis of Lung Cancer Patients With Life-Threatening Complications Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 840 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: