|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||


Department of Pneumology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Correspondence to: Wolfram Windisch, MD, Department of Pneumology, University Hospital Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany; e-mail: windisch{at}med1.ukl.uni-freiburg.de
Abstract
Background: Average volume-assured pressure support (AVAPS) has been introduced as a new additional mode for a bilevel pressure ventilation (BPV) device (BiPAP; Respironics; Murrysville, PA), but studies on the physiologic and clinical effects have not yet been performed. There is a particular need to better define the most efficient ventilatory treatment modality for patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS).
Methods: In OHS patients who did not respond to therapy with continuous positive airway pressure, the effects of BPV with the spontaneous/timed (S/T) ventilation mode with and without AVAPS over 6 weeks on ventilation pattern, gas exchange, sleep quality, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessed by the severe respiratory insufficiency questionnaire (SRI) were prospectively investigated in a randomized crossover trial.
Results: Ten patients (mean [± SD] age, 53.5 ± 11.7 years; mean body mass index, 41.6 ± 12.1 kg/m2; mean FEV1/FVC ratio, 79.4 ± 6.5%; mean transcutaneous PCO2 [PtcCO2], 58 ± 12 mm Hg) were studied. PtcCO2 nonsignificantly decreased during nocturnal BPV-S/T by 5.6 ± 11.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7 to 3.4 mm Hg; p = 0.188), but significantly decreased during BPV-S/T-AVAPS by 12.6 ± 12.2 mm Hg (95% CI, 22.0 to 3.2 mm Hg; p = 0.015). Pneumotachographic measurements revealed a higher individual variance of peak inspiratory pressure (p < 0.001) and a trend for lower leak volumes but also for higher tidal volumes during BPV-S/T-AVAPS. The SRI summary scale score improved from 63 ± 15 to 78 ± 14 during BPV-S/T (p = 0.004) and to 76 ± 16 during BPV-S/T-AVAPS (p = 0.014). Sleep quality and oxygen saturation also comparably improved following BPV-S/T and BPV-S/T-AVAPS.
Conclusion: BPV-S/T substantially improved oxygenation, sleep quality, and HRQL in patients with OHS. AVAPS provided additional benefits on ventilation quality, thus resulting in a more efficient decrease of PtcCO2. However, this did not provide further clinical benefits regarding sleep quality and HRQL.
Key Words: bilevel pressure ventilation health-related quality of life noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation obesity hypoventilation syndrome sleep
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ozsancak, C. D'Ambrosio, and N. S. Hill Nocturnal Noninvasive Ventilation Chest, May 1, 2008; 133(5): 1275 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Mokhlesi and A. Tulaimat Recent Advances in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome Chest, October 1, 2007; 132(4): 1322 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |