|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Correspondence to: Stuart Rich, MD, FCCP, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2016, Chicago, IL 60612; e-mail: srich{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Abstract
In the past decade, three classes of medications have been approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. A review of the clinical trial data for the prostanoids, endothelin antagonists, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors has shown that all agents have similar efficacy on the 6-min walk distance over 12 to 16 weeks, which was the primary end point in the randomized clinical trials. However, little is known about their long-term efficacy or about how these drugs affect the underlying disease, if at all. Successful therapy is currently defined as an improvement in exercise tolerance over a 4-month period. Future trials need to better characterize how therapies affect the pulmonary vasculature pathologically, biologically, and hemodynamically, and whether survival is actually improved.
Key Words: bosentan clinical trials prostacyclin sildenafil
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. L. Helman Jr, A. W. Brown, J. L. Jackson, and A. F. Shorr Analyzing the Short-term Effect of Placebo Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Potential Implications for the Design of Future Clinical Trials Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3): 764 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Roberts, I. Preston, and N. S. Hill Pulmonary hypertension trials: current end points are flawed, but what are the alternatives? Chest, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 934 - 936. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |