Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, R. L.
(Chest. 2006;130:1650-1656.)
© 2006 American College of Chest Physicians

A Statistical Rationale for the Use of Forced Expired Volume in 6 s*

Robert L. Jensen, PhD; Robert O. Crapo, MD, FCCP; Paul Enright, MD; Others From the Family Heart Study{dagger}

* From the Pulmonary Divisions, LDS Hospital and University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City UT. {dagger} The Family Heart Study is a National Institutes of Health-funded multicenter study.

Correspondence to: Robert L. Jensen, PhD, Pulmonary Division, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT 84143; e-mail: Ldrjens1{at}ihc.com

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the best surrogate for FVC when performing spirometry to detect obstruction or restriction. Volume-time curves from 3,539 participants in the Family Heart Study with acceptable quality test sessions were analyzed. An index of the variability of each timed volume (FEVx) from 1 to 12 s was determined for each subject. The least within-test session variability was seen for forced expired volume in 6 s (FEV6) and forced expired volume in 7 s (for both, mean range was 95 mL). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting obstruction and restriction when substituting the FEV6 for the FVC were then determined before and after allowing for measurement errors of 50 mL (approximately the lower limit of spirometers ability to detect volume). Sensitivity was 76% before the 50-mL error analysis and 95% after. Specificity was 98% before the 50-mL error analysis and 99.5% after. We conclude that use of FEV6 to replace the FVC for spirometry testing will result in improved reproducibility, with no significant loss of sensitivity or specificity, after allowing a 50-mL measurement error, for detecting obstruction or restriction.

Key Words: airway obstruction • FEV1 • spirometry






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Chest Physicians.