Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horstman, M. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stam, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horstman, M. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stam, H.
(Chest. 2007;131:237-244.)
© 2007 American College of Chest Physicians

Comparison of Total-Breath and Single-Breath Diffusing Capacity in Healthy Volunteers and COPD Patients*

Maartje J. M. Horstman, B Health; Frans W. Mertens, B ICT; Daniel Schotborg, MD; Henk C. Hoogsteden, MD, PhD and Henk Stam, PhD

* From the Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Correspondence to: Maartje J. M. Horstman, B Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, V203, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; e-mail: m.horstman{at}erasmusmc.nl

Abstract

Background: The measurement of single-breath diffusing capacity (DLCOSB) assumes that diffusing capacity per liter of alveolar volume (DLCO/VA) determined in a 750-mL gas sample represents the diffusing capacity (DLCO) of the entire lung. Fast-responding gas analyzers provide the opportunity to verify this assumption because of the possibility to measure CO and CH4 fractions continuously throughout the entire expiration. Continuous gas sampling provides more information per measurement, but this information cannot be expressed in the traditional parameters. Our goals were to find new parameters to express the extra information of the continuous gas sampling, and to compare these new parameters with the traditional parameters.

Methods: We compared a new method to determine DLCO with the traditional method in 62 healthy volunteers and 26 COPD patients. Traditionally, DLCOSB is determined by multiplying DLCO/VA with alveolar volume, both calculated from gas concentrations in a 750-mL gas sample. The new method calculates total-breath DLCO (DLCOTB) by integration of DLCO/VA against exhaled volume.

Results: In healthy volunteers, DLCO/VA shows a slight upward slope during exhalation, while in COPD patients DLCO/VA shows a horizontal line. Total-breath total lung capacity (TLC) is larger than single-breath TLC both in healthy volunteers and in COPD patients, leading to a DLCOTB that is significantly larger than DLCOSB in both groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The assumption that a 750-mL gas sample represents the entire lung seems to be correct for DLCO/VA but not for the CH4 fraction in case of ventilation inhomogeneity.

Key Words: pulmonary diffusing capacity • pulmonary gas exchange • respiratory function tests






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Chest Physicians.