This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: chest.06-2959v1 chest.06-2959v2 132/3/946    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Guerra, R. L. Articles by Dorman, S. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Guerra, R. L. Articles by Dorman, S. E.

Use of the Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test in a Public Health Laboratory^*

Test Performance and Impact on Clinical Care

^* From the School of Medicine (Ms. Maltas, and Drs. Guerra and Dorman), Johns Hopkins University; and the Maryland State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (Ms. Hooper, Mr. Baker, Ms. Alborz, Mr. Armstrong, and Dr. Kiehlbauch), Baltimore, MD.

Correspondence to: Susan E. Dorman, MD, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Room 1M-06, 1550 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD 21231; e-mail: dsusan1{at}jhmi.edu

Abstract

Background: The Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test (MTD; Gen-Probe; San Diego, CA) is a nucleic-acid amplification test for rapid pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) diagnosis. In a routine public health setting, test accuracy and impact on clinical decisions are unknown.

Methods: Retrospectively, we evaluated MTD accuracy and impact on clinical decisions in a public health setting. To estimate MTD accuracy, mycobacterial culture was used as the "gold standard." To evaluate MTD impact on clinical decisions, concordance of clinician presumptive diagnosis (at time of MTD and smear availability) and definitive diagnosis, and duration of nonindicated tuberculosis therapy were determined for smear-positive PTB suspects in a period of MTD availability (MTD group) and a prior period of MTD nonavailability (non-MTD group).

Results: A total of 1,151 respiratory specimens from 638 PTB suspects were analyzed. MTD sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 91.7%, 98.7%, 96.7%, and 96.5% overall, respectively; and 98.7%, 97.8%, 98.7%, and 97.8% for smear-positive patients; and 62.2%, 98.9%, 85.2%, and 96.1% for smear-negative patients. In the MTD group, concordance between definitive and clinician presumptive diagnoses was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 88%), similar to that for the non-MTD group (79%; 95% CI, 68.4 to 89.6%). However, concordance between definitive diagnosis and the MTD test was 98% (95% CI, 94.1 to 100%). Median duration of nonindicated tuberculosis treatment was 6 days for the MTD group vs 31 days for the non-MTD group (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: In this public health setting, MTD was accurate and rapidly detected more than half of the smear-negative PTB cases. For smear-positive PTB suspects, MTD had excellent concordance with definitive diagnosis, but clinicians often inappropriately initiated TB therapy despite a negative MTD result.

Key Words: Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test • diagnosis • respiratory specimens • tuberculosis • amplified