This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: chest.07-2654v1 133/5/1167    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Gould, M. K. Articles by Schultz, E. M. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gould, M. K. Articles by Schultz, E. M.

Timeliness of Care in Veterans With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer^*

^* From the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System (Drs. Gould, Ghaus, and Olsson), Palo Alto, CA; and Stanford School of Medicine (Ms. Schultz), Stanford, CA.

Correspondence to: Michael K. Gould, MD, MS, FCCP, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave (111P), Palo Alto, CA 94304; e-mail: gould{at}stanford.edu

Abstract

Background: Timeliness is an important dimension of quality of care for patients with lung cancer.

Methods: We reviewed the records of consecutive patients in whom non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had been diagnosed between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2003, at the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System. We used multivariable statistical methods to identify independent predictors of timely care and examined the effect of timeliness on survival.

Results: We identified 129 veterans with NSCLC (mean age, 67 years; 98% men; 83% white), most of whom had adenocarcinoma (51%) or squamous cell carcinoma (30%). A minority of patients (18%) presented with a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN). The median time from the initial suspicion of cancer to treatment was 84 days (interquartile range, 38 to 153 days). Independent predictors of treatment within 84 days included hospitalization within 7 days (odds ratio [OR], 8.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9 to 23), tumor size of > 3.0 cm (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.8 to 12.4), the presence of additional chest radiographic abnormalities (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 8.5), and the presence of one or more symptoms suggesting metastasis (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 6.2). More timely care was not associated with better survival time (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 1.9). However, in patients with SPNs, there was a trend toward better survival time when the time to treatment was < 84 days.

Conclusions: The time to treatment for patients with NSCLC was often longer than recommended. Patients with larger tumors, symptoms, and other chest radiographic abnormalities receive more timely care. In patients with malignant SPNs, survival may be better when treatment is initiated promptly.

Key Words: carcinoma • coin lesion • non-small cell lung cancer • pulmonary • quality of health care • time factors • veterans