This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: chest.07-2655v1 134/2/273    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Pitta, F. Articles by Gosselink, R. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pitta, F. Articles by Gosselink, R.

Are Patients With COPD More Active After Pulmonary Rehabilitation?^*

^* From the Respiratory Rehabilitation and Respiratory Division, University Hospitals, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Correspondence to: Rik Gosselink, PhD, PT, Respiratory Rehabilitation and Respiratory Division, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; e-mail: Rik.Gosselink{at}faber.kuleuven.be

Abstract

Background: Despite a variety of benefits brought by pulmonary rehabilitation to patients with COPD, it is unclear whether these patients are more active during daily life after the program.

Methods: Physical activities in daily life (activity monitoring), pulmonary function (spirometry), exercise capacity (incremental cycle-ergometer testing and 6-min walk distance testing), muscle force (quadriceps and handgrip force, and inspiratory and expiratory maximal pressures), quality of life (chronic respiratory disease questionnaire), and functional status (pulmonary functional status and dyspnea questionnaire-modified version) were assessed at baseline, after 3 months of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program, and at the end of a 6-month multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in 29 patients (mean [± SD] age, 67 ± 8 years; FEV₁, 46 ± 16% predicted).

Results: Exercise capacity, muscle force, quality of life, and functional status improved significantly after 3 months of pulmonary rehabilitation (all p < 0.05), with further improvements in muscle force, functional status, and quality of life at 6 months. Movement intensity during walking improved significantly after 3 months (p = 0.046) with further improvements after 6 months (p = 0.0002). Walking time in daily life did not improve significantly at 3 months (mean improvement, 7 ± 35%; p = 0.21), but only after 6 months (mean improvement, 20 ± 36%; p = 0.008). No significant changes occurred in other activities or in the pattern of the time spent walking in daily life. Changes in dyspnea after the program were significantly related to changes in walking time in daily life (r = 0.43; p = 0.02).

Conclusion: If one aims at changing physical activity habits in the daily life of COPD patients, the contribution of long-lasting programs might be important.

Key Words: COPD • exercise • physical activity • pulmonary rehabilitation