Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEVINE, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LEVINE, M. I.
(Chest. 1949;16:288-300.)
© 1949 American College of Chest Physicians

A Critical Analysis of BCG in the Prevention of Tuberculosis

MILTON I. LEVINE M.D.1

1 The New York Hospital and the Department of Pediatrics, Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York.

1) In spite of the present wave of enthusiasm over the use of B.C.G. in the prophylaxts of tuberculosis, the subject is still controversial.

2) The loss of virulence of the bovine tubercle organisms in B.C.G. is complete and permanent and the use of the vaccine in human beings is entirely safe.

3) Although many favorable reports have been published on the efficacy of B.C.G. vaccine these studies, with very few exceptions, have been poorly controlled.

4) A critical analysis is made of studies on B.C.G. reported from New York City, Chicago and from various Indian reservations.

5) The degree of immunity as well as the duration of the immunity conferred by B.C.G. has not as yet been determined.

6) The use of common antituberculous methods has been so successful in the United States that the need for a prophylactic agent such as B.C.G., is less acute than in countries lacking adequate antituberculosis facilities.

7) Before the use of B.C.G. vaccine can be accepted as a general public health measure, considerable knowledge is still necessary.

8) The B.C.G. vaccine can in no way be offered as a substitute for other antituberculosis methods so successfully used in this country. At best, it may be offered as a supplement to already existing control measures in the United States.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1949 by the American College of Chest Physicians.