Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHAMASKIN, A.
Right arrow Articles by MINDLIN, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHAMASKIN, A.
Right arrow Articles by MINDLIN, J.
(Chest. 1949;16:765-787.)
© 1949 American College of Chest Physicians

Streptomycin in the Treatment of Miliary and Meningeal Tuberculosis Based on a Study of 30 Cases

ARNOLD SHAMASKIN M.D., F.C.C.P.1; EUGENE J. Des AUTELS M.D., F.C.C.P.2; HENRY C. SWEANY M.D., F.C.C.P.3; LOUIS C. MORRIS M.D.4; JAMES R. ZVETINA M.D.5; and JOSEPH MINDLIN M.D.5

1 Chief, Tuberculosis Service.
2 Assistant Chief, Tuberculosis Service.
3 Consultant in Tuberculosis.
4 Attending Physician in Tuberculosis.
5 Physician, Streptomycin Research Section.

1) Streptomycin seems effective in the treatment of uncomplicated cases of miliary tuberculosis. This could be accounted for by the small size of the individual tubercle which may permit the drug to readily penetrate throughout the lesion in therapeutic concentration and to come in direct contact with all the organisms, a condition which probably does not exist where larger areas of caseation are present.

2) Streptomycin did not prevent the development of tuberculous meningitis in patients while they were under treatment with the same drug for other tuberculous conditions.

3) It seems possible that the main obstacles to successful therapy of tuberculous meningitis may be: (a) a factor in the brain, presumably, yet unidentified, which has the property of inhibiting streptomycin and thus rendering it ineffective; and (b) the relative inability of streptomycin to penetrate the larger caseous foci.

4) Until a more effective antibacterial agent against tuberculosis may be discovered, efforts will undoubtedly be continued to identify the streptomycin inhibiting factor in the brain, and to find means of combating it. Further search is also indicated for some means of more effectively carrying the therapeutic agent into the caseous masses.

5) Our experiences thus far lead us to believe that higher doses of streptomycin would probably not materially improve the results in tuberculous meningitis and in combined miliary and meningeal tuberculosis. It does not seem likely that the streptomycin inhibiting factor in the brain and the conditions which seem to prevent the drug from entering the caseo-necrotic mass in therapeutic concentration, could be overcome with relative safety by sheer volume of this antibiotic.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1949 by the American College of Chest Physicians.