Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CARR, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by BROWN, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CARR, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by BROWN, H. A.
(Chest. 1949;16:801-815.)
© 1949 American College of Chest Physicians

The Use of Dihydrostreptomycin in the Treatment of Tuberculosis

DAVID T. CARR M.D.1; H. CORWIN HINSHAW M.D.1; KARL H. PFUETZE M.D., F.C.C.P.2; and HENRY A. BROWN M.D.3

1 Division of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
2 The Mineral Springs Sanatorium, Cannon Falls, Minnesota.
3 The Section on Otolaryngology and Rhinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Dihydrostreptomycin, a derivative of streptomycin, has been reported to be as effective as the parent drug against the tubercle bacillus in vitro and against experimental tuberculosis in various animals. The neurotoxicity of the two drugs has also been studied experimentally and dihydrostreptomycin has been reported to be less toxic than streptomycin.

The present report summarizes our experience with the first 35 patients whom we treated with the new drug. Dihydrostreptomycin was found to be less neurotoxic than streptomycin, only four of 26 patients showing any sign or symptom of vestibular damage when a daily dose of 2 gm. was given for long periods. Two patients noted slight deafness after treatment was completed and audiograms revealed the development of deafness for the high frequencies in one of them. No allergic reactions occurred, although nine of these 35 patients had 7.5 per cent or more of eosinophils. No other changes in the blood were noted. Studies of function of liver and kidneys did not reveal damage to these organs. Dihydrostreptomycin seemed to be as effective as streptomycin in the treatment of various types of tuberculosis, but much more work must be done to determine if the same doses of the two drugs are equally effective. The frequency of dihydrostreptomycin-resistant strains of tubercle bacilli is not yet known, but three of these patients discharged resistant organisms during treatment, one of them after only 18 days of therapy.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1949 by the American College of Chest Physicians.