Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HUGHES, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by LOWRY, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HUGHES, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by LOWRY, C. C.
(Chest. 1950;18:244-249.)
© 1950 American College of Chest Physicians

Pulmonary Resection and Streptomycin in the Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

FELIX A. HUGHES M.D., F.C.C.P.1; SAMUEL PHILLIPS M.D., F.C.C.P.1; NELSON H. KRAEFT M.D.1; MARVIN L. WILLIAMS M.D.1; and CONIE C. LOWRY M.D.1

1 The Thoracic Section, Surgical Service, and the Tuberculosis Section, Medical Service, Veterans Administration, Medical Teaching Group, Kennedy Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.

1) Pulmonary resection with concomitant streptomycin therapy, is a valuable method of treatment for suitable types of pulmonary tuberculosis.

2) stability appears to be the most vital factor in the evaluation of a patient for this procedure.

3) Preliminary courses of streptomycin make surgery feasible for some of the poor risk cases. Correct evaluation of stability, however, is thereby made more difficult.

4) Resistance, contralateral disease, and the amount of lung to be resected are other factors that appear to be of importance in the evaluation of suitable cases.

5) Resection has not decreased the necessity of prolonged bed-rest rest and treatment but has made it more important and essential. Prompt active treatment of complications is possible only in co-operative patients who remain under medical care.

6) Resection is not considered to be a substitute for, or to be in competition with, recognized collapse procedures. It has been used where these procedures have failed or could be predicated to fail.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1950 by the American College of Chest Physicians.