Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROGERS, A. E. T.
Right arrow Articles by BOGEN, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ROGERS, A. E. T.
Right arrow Articles by BOGEN, E.
(Chest. 1952;22:478-484.)
© 1952 American College of Chest Physicians

The Rise and Fall of Physical Examination in the Diagnosis of Diseases of the Chest

A. E. T. ROGERS M.D., F.C.C.P. and EMIL BOGEN M.D., F.C.C.P.

The use of physical signs in the diagnosis of diseases of the chest developed rapidly after the discovery of the stethoscope, and reached its acme at the end of the nineteenth century. It has since tended to decline as a result of the greater emphasis on etiological and functional, rather than on purely anatomical aspects of disease and the introduction of more sensitive and reliable endoscopic, radiologic and laboratory methods. Despite the gross fallibility of physical examination, however, neglect of its teaching and application is deplored. The eye, ears, and touch remain the quickest, simplest and most readily available means of detecting pathologic alterations. Suspicion aroused by physical findings is often the necessary precursor to the application of the instrumental, radiologic and laboratory measures which are required to establish the diagnosis. Omission of the more delicate and precise objective methods through excessive confidence in the less trustworthy physical signs can only lead to disaster.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1952 by the American College of Chest Physicians.