Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHWARTZ, E.
Right arrow Articles by KALTER, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SCHWARTZ, E.
Right arrow Articles by KALTER, H. H.
(Chest. 1955;28:91-97.)
© 1955 American College of Chest Physicians

Right Aortic Arch Versus Mediastinal Tumors and Densities: Diagnostic Problems

EMANUEL SCHWARTZ M.D., F.C.C.P.1 and HENRY H. KALTER M.D.1

1 The Bedford Chest Clinic of the Bureau of Tuberculosis, New York City, Department of Health.

It is of importance to recognize a right aortic arch not only for the occasional symptoms which may be produced by it, but more so, to differentiate it from mediastinal tumors and diseases of lymph nodes. The seven selected cases presented in this article, emphasize the diagnostic and differential diagnostic problems that we have encountered.

Three cases were presented in which the investigation for mediastinal and pulmonary pathology revealed a right aortic arch as an accidental finding. These three patients had somewhat dilated, elongated and tortuous aortic vessels. Their routine posterior-anterior chest films were not suggestive of right aortic arch. Two cases presented a bilateral upper mediastinal density suggestive of right aortic arch with additional mediastinal pathology. The esophagram revealed a right aortic arch in one case and excluded that diagnosis in the other. In both cases the manubrium sterni added to the diagnostic problems encountered. Positional deviations of the sternal manubrium are not infrequent. Two cases were shown with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes simulating right aortic arch.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1955 by the American College of Chest Physicians.