Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HARDEN, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by CARR, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HARDEN, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by CARR, C.
(Chest. 1955;28:493-505.)
© 1955 American College of Chest Physicians

The Time Factor in Electrocardiography Following Chest Surgery

K. ALBERT HARDEN M.D.1; DONALD KELLER M.D.1; OSCAR ELLISON M.D.1; and CHRISTINA CARR 1

1 The Division of Chronic Pulmonary Disease of Freedmen's Hospital and the Department of Medicine, Howard University, Washington, D. C.

Review of pre-operative electrocardiograms on 95 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis who were candidates for chest surgery revealed one abnormal electrocardiogram. Comparison of the pre-operative and post-operative electrocardiograms (one to four months after completion of surgery) of 51 indicated that approximately 50 per cent showed some electrocardiographic changes. Only one, however, had an electrocardiogram indicating myocardial disease and it was compatible with pericarditis and myocardial damage. In all of the others the differences noted could apparently be explained by positional changes in the heart and mediastinum.

Analysis of electrocardiograms on 28, two to ten years following chest surgery, showed that two had evidence of heart disease, neither of which were compatible with the findings in pulmonary heart disease. It is pointed out that electrocardiographic findings without reference to cardiac position may be misleading with reference to the existence of right ventricular hypertrophy.

The importance of the time factor in explaining many of the divergent reports on the frequency and nature of electrocardiographic findings following chest surgery is stressed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1955 by the American College of Chest Physicians.