Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GREER, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GREER, A. E.
(Chest. 1956;29:508-519.)
© 1956 American College of Chest Physicians

Pulmonary Brucellosis

ALVIS E. GREER M.D., F.C.C.P.

A survey of 41 cases of pulmonary brucellosis, furnished me by 13 of 187 chest specialists has been reviewed. Nine cases were selected from the 41, and combined with 18 of my own, and were subjected to a detailed analysis. Involvement of the lungs by brucellosis has received scant attention in the literature, and the fact that only 13 of 187 physicians had seen such localization, suggests a widespread unawareness of pulmonary brucellosis, especially the chronic type, in the minds of physicians generally. The disease has a tendency to develop latency or a chronic, subclinical infection; therefore, such patients should be observed and checked for many months after they have seemingly recovered. The relative value of the various diagnostic tests has been stated. The treatment of the acute cases with antibiotics is good from an immediate standpoint; how many may have relapsed subsequently we do not know nor wish to hazard a guess. The chronic cases constitute a real therapeutic problem as therapy is very unsatisfactory. The seven cases treated with a cobalt, copper and manganese combination with apparent recovery were given this on an empirical basis. They attained good health, which was maintained for many months of subsequent observation. It is impossible for me to state at this time any reasonable and scientific explanation for the beneficial or curative effects of this mode of therapy. No claim is made, whatsoever, in regard to its specificity. My main object is to suggest its trial on an experimental basis by other physicians in order to determine its unworthiness or worth.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1956 by the American College of Chest Physicians.