Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BROCK, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BROCK, B. L.
(Chest. 1960;38:391-398.)
© 1960 American College of Chest Physicians

Comparative Results in the Use of Two Commercial PPD Skin Tests in 569 Admissions

BENJAMIN L. BROCK M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 Medical Director, Southeast Florida Tuberculosis Hospital.

This study was undertaken to determine the role of intermediate and second strength PPD in the diagnosis of tuberculosis and in addition, to determine if possible whether there might be any differences in the manufacture of PPD. Two commercial brands of PPD were used, one being given on the volar surface of one forearm and one on the other.

If these tests were negative, the same strength intermediate OT was given and if the patient again failed to react, a second strength PPD was given. The degree of induration was measured at 48 hours and at 72 hours under four headings, namely. 0 mm. to 5 mm., 6 mm. to 10 mm., 11 mm. to 20 mm., and 21 mm. or over.

Seven (1.2 per cent) of the cases reacted only to second strength PPD. So far as diagnosis is concerned, a second strength PPD is reliable as an exclusion test for tuberculosis; however, a negative intermediate PPD does not rule out tuberculosis. Although there were definite differences in the degree of reaction to the two commercial tuberclins, when one was positive the other was always positive. These differences in reaction are therefore not important so far as diagnosis is concerned.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1960 by the American College of Chest Physicians.