Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOBROWITZ, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by LIN, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BOBROWITZ, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by LIN, A.
(Chest. 1961;40:397-406.)
© 1961 American College of Chest Physicians

Effect of Direct Irradiation on the Course of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (Using Cancerocidal Doses)

I. D. BOBROWITZ M.D., F.C.C.P.1; MILTON ELKIN M.D.2; JOHN C. EVANS M.D.3; and ALBERT LIN M.D.4

1 Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine (Pulmonary Diseases), Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
2 Professor of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
3 Associate Professor of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
4 Assistant Professor of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

1. In this study, cases of inoperable lung cancer coexistent with pulmonary tuberculosis were irradiated with cancerocidal doses.

2. Seven patients in whom neoplasm developed in an area of tuberculosis were treated. The dose of irradiation at the central lung varied from 4000 r to 6800 r given in 37 to 104 days.

3. All patients received antituberculosis drugs.

4. The total period of observation after irradiation varied from seven weeks to thirty-two and one-half months.

5. In only one of the seven patients was there x-ray film evidence of change that could possibly be due to relapse of tuberculosis. In this patient (Case 7) the changes might be due to radiation necrosis (8800 r). This patient, moreover, had discontinued antituberculosis drug treatment after irradiation.

6. The experience in this small series of patients would indicate that irradiation of pulmonary neoplasms coexistent with pulmonary tuberculosis with cancerocidal doses can be accomplished without danger of deterioration of the tuberculosis if proper antituberculosis drug coverage is provided. In the presence of considerable drug resistance it would be desirable to add another antituberculosis drug to which the microorganism is sensitive to avoid any possible hazard of irradiation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1961 by the American College of Chest Physicians.