Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Schierbler, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Schierbler, G. L.
(Chest. 1965;47:254-263.)
© 1965 American College of Chest Physicians

The Significance of the Posteriorly Oriented QRS sE Loop in Congenital Heart Disease

A Potential Source of Error in the Electrorardiographic Diagnosis of Ventricular Hypertrophy

Larry P. Elliott M.D.1; Naip Tuna M.D.2; Herbert D. Ruttenberg M.D.3; and Gerold L. Schierbler M.D.4

1 Department of Pathology, Charles T. Miller Hospital, St. Paul, Minnesota
2 Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
3 Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
4 Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida

In 15 necropsy-proved cases with various congenital cardiac malformations, potential sources of error were present when utilizing conventional electrocardiographic criteria to determine ventricular hypertrophy.

These potential sources of error were the ultimate result of three types of posteriorly oriented QRS sE loops, with the culminative electrical forces in all cases resulting in rS complexes in lead V1, and deep S complexes in lead V6.

Type I QRS sE loops were oriented right and posterior. Each case at necropsy showed isolated right ventricular hypertrophy. The proper electrocardiographic interpretation of right ventricular hypertrophy is aided by a predominant R wave in lead V4R and marked right axis deviation in the frontal plane, even though an rS or QS wave is present in lead V1.

Type II QRS sE loops were positioned directly posterior, with little rightward or leftward projection, producing sterotype rS complexes in all precordial leads, including lead V4R. This type of QRS loop is present in malformations with distortions on their conduction system.

Type III QRS sE loops, positioned posterior, leftward, and superior, also have rS complexes in V1. By conventional electrocardiographic criteria each case had left ventricular hypertrophy, confirmed in all at necropsy.

In addition, however, relatively deep S waves and tall R waves were present in V6 and aVR, respectively. These patterns might suggest additional right ventricular hypertrophy—a supposition unconfirmed at necropsy. Thus we interpret these patterns as a manifestation of marked left ventricular hypertrophy, even though the terminal portion of the QRS sE loop is rightward and posterior. The association of marked left axis deviation and a decrease in the size of the S wave in lead V7 aids in the proper diagnosis of isolated left ventricular hypertrophy.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American College of Chest Physicians.