Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zucker, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zucker, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, A.
(Chest. 1965;47:314-320.)
© 1965 American College of Chest Physicians

Current Status of the Treatment of Complete Heart Block

I. Richard Zucker M.D., F.C.C.P.1; Victor Parsonnet M.D.2; Lawrence Gilbert M.D., F.C.C.P.2; and Arthur Bernstein M.D. F.C.C.P.2

1 Director, Hemodynamics Department and Chief, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
2 Hemodynamics Department, Newark Beth Israel Hospital

Medical management of complete heart block affords but a temporary control neither stable nor dependable and its failure is too frequently unheralded and fatal. Electric pacing by interim transvenous stimulation provides immediate, stable, and dependable control.

Indications for transvenous pacing or pacemaker implantation should include not only Stokes-Adams disease, but heart block with signs and symptoms of diminished cardiac output and with heart rates under 40 per minute as well. Patients with complete heart block are protected best by pacing with a transvenous intracardiac dipolar electrode preparaton to and during anesthesia for surgery.

A series of 40 patients is presented. There was a total of 56 catheterizations. There were nine emergencies requiring immediate transvenous pacing. In this group, there were five deaths due to extensive intercurrent disease. This stresses the importance of the use of the dipolar electrode in patients too ill for permanent implantation, because despite their desperate medical condition, four of these patients were supported sufficiently so that subsequent permanent implantation was done without a fatality.

Permanent asynchronous implantable pacemakers, though requiring battery change, are relatively simple to insert and are preferable to externally worn units. Of the 31 patients who have had permanently implanted pacemakers, there was one postoperative death. The four others died months later of unrelated disease, and the remaining patients, despite corrective episodes of pacemaker failure are all well, free of symptoms of heart block, and rehabilitated to activity normal for their age.

Those patients who returned because of permanent pacemaker system failure and were paced transvenously, and those patients with intermittent regular sinus rhythm exhibited competitive pacing mechanisms. Electric or sino-atrial impulses appearing during any phase of the cardiac cycle did not precipitate ventricular fibrillation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American College of Chest Physicians.