Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Tabakin, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Tabakin, B. S.
(Chest. 1966;49:52-56.)
© 1966 American College of Chest Physicians

Correlation of Vital Capacity with Other Indices of Disease in Obstructive Emphysema

John S. Hanson M.D.1 and Burton S. Tabakin M.D.1

1 Cardiopulmonary Laboratory, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Mary Fletcher Hospital

The pulmonary function studies of 170 patients with evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema have been analyzed to determine the status of the vital capacity in this disease and its degree of correlation with other lung volumes and capacities, the RV/TLC ratio and the maximum breathing capacity.

Ten per cent of the group with evidence of "moderate" or "advanced" disease demonstrated a VC from 90 - 130 per cent of normal predicted and would, on the basis of VC measurement alone, be falsely judged ac "normal." Conversely, 35 patients or 21 per cent of the group classified in the "mild" or "moderate" disease categories had abnormally low VC's. Thus, utilizing VC as the sole indicator of disease severity, nearly one-third of the group would be incorrectly evaluated and would represent either "false positive" or "false negative" diagnoses. Although the general trend is for VC to deteriorate with advanced degrees of COPE, exceptions to this occur with sufficient frequency to invalidate use of the VC alone for diagnosis of this condition or estimation of its severity. From the standpoint of function testing, evaluation of a patient should rather be based on complete lung volume determinations, MBC, RV/TLC ratio and pulmonary nitrogen washout curves.20,21







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the American College of Chest Physicians.