Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noehren, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schnatz, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noehren, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schnatz, P. T.
(Chest. 1967;51:113-120.)
© 1967 American College of Chest Physicians

Ether Clearance as a Measure of Alveolar Ventilation I. A Demonstration of Factors that Influence the Effectiveness of Intermittent Positive Pressure Breathing (IPPB/I) Therapy

Theodore H. Noehren M.D., F.C.C.P.1 and Paul T. Schnatz M.D.1

1 Buffalo, New York

A new method of determining effective ventilation in a variety of laboratory and clinical problems is presented. The measurement of ether clearance from the lungs following its administration by intravenous solution is a relatively simple and safe procedure which avoids the difficulties of previous methods for alveolar gas determinations. As such, it is applicable in both normal and abnormal lungs, in anesthetic and non-anesthetic states and in rebreathing studies when alterations in the usual respiratory gases are not desirable.

The feasibility of this new method is illustrated by laboratory demonstrations of the effects of some variables in intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB/I) on ventilation in dogs. Ventilation increased in proportion to peak inspiratory pressure, to the rate of respiration, and in general proportion to the size of the animal when the airway was unobstructed. Ventilation was not, however, directly proportional to peak inspiratory flow rate, nor to frequency of respiration in the partially obstructed airway. The further applicability and studies of these principles by this method in clinical subjects is indicated.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American College of Chest Physicians.