Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russek, H. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russek, H. I.
(Chest. 1967;52:1-9.)
© 1967 American College of Chest Physicians

Role of Emotional Stress in the Etiology of Clinical Coronary Heart Disease

Henry I. Russek M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 Senior Attending Cardiologist, St. Barnabas Hospital, New York; Consultant in Cardiovascular Disease, U. S. Public Health Service Hospital, Staten Island

The concept of any disease arising from a single cause is obsolete and misleading. Much evidence now suggests that most of the lethalness of a high fat diet in Western society may actually be dependent on the "catalytic" influence of stressful living. Indeed, while habitual diet and psychic stress both appear implicated in the pathogenesis of clinical coronary disease, there is mounting evidence to suggest that each of these factors is dependent upon the other for pathologic significance. Observations in the animal kingdom, in the experimental laboratory, and in epidemiologic surveys all attest to the validity of this pathogenetic interrelationship. Like "stressed" animals in the laboratory, "stressed" humans have manifested no increased susceptibility to atherosclerosis unless the composition of the diet had been high in animal fat. Contrariwise, numerous examples are now at hand to indicate the low atherogenicity of a high fat diet when there is relative freedom from serious psychologic stress.

Despite the profound effect of "stress" on homeostatic mechanisms this factor has been largely ignored by most authorities in the field of coronary artery disease. Major emphasis has been placed on hypercholesterolemia, overweight, high blood pressure, lack of exercise, cigarette smoking and diabetes. Nevertheless, nervous strain is known to elevate blood pressure, to increase the tendency to obesity, to contribute to excessive smoking and lack of exercise, to participate in hypercholesterolemia, and to aggravate diabetes, through psychic influence and alteration of the functional characteristics of the mode of life. Consequently, even such indirect effects of emotional stress, barring all others, must elevate this factor to a position of considerable significance in the etiologic picture of coronary heart disease.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American College of Chest Physicians.