Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, R.
(Chest. 1967;52:273-285.)
© 1967 American College of Chest Physicians

Revascularization of the Ischemic Posterior Myocardium

Charles P. Bailey M.D., F.C.C.P.1; Teruo Hirose M.D., F.C.C.P.1; Avenilo Aventura M.D.1; Nozomu Yamamoto M.D.1; Russell Brancato M.D.1; Cesar Vera M.D.1; and Robert O'Connor M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 New York, New York

A four-phased experimental program to develop an effective method for revascularization of the "posterior" wall of the left ventricle was undertaken in the fall of 1963. All experiments involving intramyocardial implantation of "new" arteries created by grafting techniques (autologous venous or arterial segments) proved disappointing. Finally reasoning that such necessarily totally denervated graft "arteries" would not respond to what Vineberg12 has called "arteriotaxis" like normally innervated arteries (such as the internal mammary) a search was made for a suitable "expendable" abdominal artery.

The right gastroepiploic artery was chosen as best fulfilling the various assumed requirements and a series of animals was submitted to "implant revascularization" with a pedicle containing this artery. The experimental results with respect to prolonged patency and eventual vascular communication with the natural coronary arterial branches were essentially identical to those seen with the implanted internal mammary artery.

A clinical series of 27 patients, chosen and monitored with the help of selective coronary cineangiography was commenced. Only patients with clearly delineated severe obstructive disease of one or more of the major coronary trunks were selected. The procedure, even when combined with anterior implantation of the internal mammary artery, proved to be well tolerated even in older patients (oldest 72).

Excluding patients less than one month postoperatively (seven) all but one of the survivors report significant improvement with respect to anginal pain. Nine of the series report dramatic relief—essentially no pain under conditions of normal living.

Injection studies (at necropsy) of the heart of the one patient in this series who died of unrelated causes four months after a double implant operation revealed early and equal development of anastomosis from the internal mammary and right gastroepiploic arteries to the respective contiguous distal coronary arterial branches.

This evidence, while promising, does not yet constitute final proof of the validity of this proposed method for revascularization of the posterior myocardium. However, theoretical presumptions based upon the structural similarities between the anterior and posterior ventricular walls and the similarities in behavior of the implanted gastroepiploic and internal mammary arteries encourage us to continue this study.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American College of Chest Physicians.