Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, A. M.
(Chest. 1967;52:508-517.)
© 1967 American College of Chest Physicians

Syndrome of Vigorous Achalasia: Clinical and Physiologic Observations

David R. Sanderson M.D., F.C.C.P.1; F. Henry Ellis Jr. M.D.2; Jerry F. Schlegel B.S.3; and Arthur M. Olsen M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation: Section of Medicine
2 Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation: Section of Surgery
3 Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation: Section of Physiology

Vigorous achalasia is an esophageal disorder manifesting clinical and x-ray characteristics of achalasia and diffuse spasm. Since 1956, 88 of more than 5,800 patients referred to the Mayo Clinic for esophageal motility tests have been diagnosed as having vigorous achalasia. Sixteen cases were excluded as not representative or as showing some peculiarities. Thus, 72 cases form the basis of this report.

The patients ranged in age from 12 to 79 years. All but one had dysphagia, 56 had regurgitation, and 51 had pain. Cardiospasm, dilatation, and diffuse spasm were the most common of the roentgenologic interpretations. Esophageal motility studies were obtained in all cases, and pressure-detecting units were passed into the stomach in 68 cases. The orderly relaxation and contraction of the gastroesophageal sphincter observed in health after swallowing were not observed. Relaxation was absent or poor in all cases, and only one patient had normal contraction of the sphincter. All patients developed high esophageal pressures during the simultaneous contractions. No peristalsis was detected. Resistance to the passage of a sound felt to the examiner like achalasia in ten of 14 cases and more like diffuse spasm in four. Endoscopy, performed in 32 cases, suggested achalasia in 11 and spasm in three; results were normal in eight cases and suggested other lesions in the remaining ten.

Treatment consisted of simple dilatation (eight cases), hydrostatic dilatation alone (ten cases), a modified Heller myotomy alone (40 cases), and a combination of the last-named procedures (seven cases). Seven patients were not treated at this clinic. Surgical treatment by the modified Heller myotomy was more effective than hydrostatic dilatation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American College of Chest Physicians.