Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harken, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harken, D. E.
(Chest. 1968;54:349-352.)
© 1968 American College of Chest Physicians

One Surgeon Looks at Human Heart Transplantation

Dwight Emary Harken M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 Clinical Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School: Chief of Thoracic Surgery, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital and Mount Auburn Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

1. Conditions requisite to surgical centers entering upon human heart transplantation programs are outlined: by definition and by inference.

2. Hopefully, the role of "the doctor playing God" is placed in realistic perspective. The public's duty is restated toward reducing the burdens of this dangerously flexible, but very old responsibility. Public responsibility in determining priorities in the expenditure of public funds and the serious limitations of existing clinical and research facilities are related to human heart transplantation, public health, and preventive medicine.

3. Some consequences of premature overexposure in the communication media may: mix the dangers and benefits of competition, be constructive or destructive to the medical image and, directly and indirectly, alter the efficacy of the physician and the quality of medical care.

4. Moral and legal discussions are found helpful if they clarify, and harmful if they over-restrict. The conscience of the medical personnel predicated on enlightened patient- and self-interest remain the bulwark of patient and public protection. If legalistic and moral dogma move toward euthanasia or delay through committee bureaucracy, they constitute harmful forces.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American College of Chest Physicians.