Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
(Chest. 1969;55:332-335.)
© 1969 American College of Chest Physicians

Operations for Coronary Disease

Report of the Committee on Cardiovascular Surgery American College of Chest Physicians

The study strongly suggests that certain types of procedures, namely arterial implants, single, multiple and coronary endarterectomy or arteriotomy and patch, are affording adequate clinical and laboratory evidence of revascularization of the myocardium. These procedures appear to be developed now to a point where they are safe enough from a standpoint of postoperative mortality to be conscientiously recommended for patients with intractable angina, subject, of course, to a proper evaluation with the usual clinical and laboratory investigations that in the judgement of the cardiologist rule out other causes of the chest pain and disability.

Certain operations previously popular are now infrequently performed and no significant statistics are available to indicate their efficacy. The returns from the questionnaire in these categories lack evidence of clinical improvement and roentgenologic and laboratory investigation both pre- and postoperatively.

Lastly, this study suggests that long term follow-up of this same group is essential to establish the ultimate effects of the operation as compared with a control group. Such a study has been authorized and will be continued by the Committee on Cardiovascular Surgery and by the Committee on Caronary Disease of the American College of Chest Physicians.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American College of Chest Physicians.