Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grabau, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grabau, A. A.
(Chest. 1969;55:411-414.)
© 1969 American College of Chest Physicians

Comparison of Tuberculin Testing Between Mono-Vacc and Mantoux

A. Arthur Grabau M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 Director, Division of Tuberculosis Control, Erie County Department of Health, Buffalo, New York

The Mono-Vacc tuberculin test was evaluated as a screening device and was compared with the Mantoux (PPD, 5 TU). A total of 2,022 subjects were tested simultaneously with these two tests. Results from each test were read separately and independently by two readers 72 hours after administration. When the presence of any detectable induration was considered a positive Mono-Vacc reaction and compared to a positive Mantoux reaction of 10 mm or greater, Mono-Vacc produced no false negatives and 1 percent false positives. When induration of 6 mm or greater was considered a positive Mono-Vacc reaction and compared to a positive Mantoux reaction of 10 mm or greater, Mono-Vacc produced 3.3 percent false negatives and 0.26 percent false positives. This preliminary report on a relatively small population sample reveals good agreement between the Mono-Vacc and Mantoux tests and indicates that Mono-Vacc is a reliable test for screening purposes.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American College of Chest Physicians.