Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spivey, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bopp, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spivey, C. G., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Bopp, R. K.
(Chest. 1969;56:13-18.)
© 1969 American College of Chest Physicians

Cavitary Coccidioidomycosis: Experience in a Tuberculosis Hospital Outside the Endemic Area

Charles G. Spivey Jr. MC, USAF, F.C.C.P.1; Frederick L. Jones M.D., F.C.C.P.1; and Raymond K. Bopp MC, USAF1

1 Pulmonary Disease Service, Department of Medicine, USAF Hospital Scott, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois

At a military hospital far from the endemic area for Coccidioides immitis, 24 cases of cavitary coccidioidomycosis were seen in approximately six years; all were referred with the initial impression of cavitary tuberculosis. When evaluating a patient with a cavitary lesion in the lungs, a history of residency, however brief, within the endemic area should arouse suspicion. Although lack of such a history makes coccidioidomycosis extremely unlikely, a past history of known acute coccidioidomycosis or pneumonia, influenzal illness, or unexparticularly valuable, for cavitary lesions are invariably residuals of acute primary infection. When symptoms and physical examination were not helpful, skin tests, cultures, serologies, x-ray findings and geographic history proved essential for diagnosis. The majority of the patients had no specific therapy, and in those in whom surgery was attempted a significant number of complications were noted.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American College of Chest Physicians.