Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrd, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Knies, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Byrd, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Knies, A. A.
(Chest. 1969;56:447-449.)
© 1969 American College of Chest Physicians

The Mono-Vacc Tuberculin Skin Test

Richard B. Byrd Lt. Colonel, USAF, MC, F.C.C.P.1; Douglas R. Gracey Captain, USAF, MC2; Daniel C. Campbell Jr. Colonel, USAF, MC, F.C.C.P.3; and Aurelia A. Knies R.N.4

1 Departments of Pulmonary Disease, USAF Hospital Scott, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois
2 Departments of Pulmonary Disease, USAF Hospital Scott, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
3 Thoracic Surgery, USAF Hospital Scott, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois
4 Tuberculosis Control, USAF Hospital Scott, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois

The Mono-Vacc tuberculin test was evaluated in a group of 1,423 individuals, the standard for comparison being simultaneously administered Mantoux (PPD, 5 TU). In approximately one-half of these individuals, it was compared with the tine tuberculin test as well. The Mono-Vacc test was found to be acceptable for screening patients for tuberculin sensitivity. It was easily applied, highly acceptable to patients, and produced readily measurable induration. False negative reactions occurred in 1.2 percent which is within the intratest variability of the Mantoux test and thus unlikely to be statistically significant. The primary limiting factor was an 8.4 percent incidence of false positive reactions. However, the ease with which this test is applied would appear to more than compensate for the time spent in retesting with the Mantoux those who prove to be false positives. The tine tuberculin test was found to give similar results, but was more difficult to read and was less acceptable to patients.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American College of Chest Physicians.