Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grant, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Metherall, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grant, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Metherall, W.
(Chest. 1971;60:129-132.)
© 1971 American College of Chest Physicians

Comparison of Isoproterenol and Isoproterenol-Phenylephrine Aerosols

Joseph L. Grant M.D.1; Norman Werfelman 1; Milton R. Cook M.S.1; and William Metherall B.S.1

1 Medical and Pharmacy Services, Veterans Administration Hospital, White River Junction, Vermont and the Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire

Thirty patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had their vital capacity (VC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) measured before, one-half hour after, and two and a half hours after they breathed aerosols of isoproterenol (cartridge M), isoproterenol with phenylephrine (cortridge D), or a placebo. The placebo had negligible mean effects. Thirty minutes after each isoproterenol cartridge there was a rise in mean VC and FEV1 which was statistically significant compared to the change 30 minutes after the placebo. There was no significant difference between the two aerosols in effect on VC or FEV1 at 30 minutes. Two and one-half hours after the inhalations, there was no significantly greater persistent effect on VC or FEV1 after cartridge D than after cartridge M. Cartridge M had greater effects on VC than D when used initially; when used as a second dose its effects were halved, possibly because in the study it was given after tolerance to isoproterenol had developed after the administration of cartridge D.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American College of Chest Physicians.