Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farrehi, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farrehi, C.
(Chest. 1972;61:121-124.)
© 1972 American College of Chest Physicians

Cardiovascular Effects of Carotid Sinus Nerve Stimulation in Resting Man

Cyrus Farrehi M.D.1

1 Chairman, Department of Medicine, McLaren Hospital, Flint, Michigan

The carotid sinus nerves were selectively stimulated in three patients and observations were made in basal state before and 15 minutes after the onset of continuous stimulation. The myocardial oxygen consumption decreased from 5.5 ± 0.6 to 4.8 ± 0.5 ml/min/100 gm, and the coronary blood flow from 48 ± 6 to 43 ± 6 ml/min/100 gm (mean ± SE). The coronary arteriovenous oxygen difference remained the same in two and narrowed in one patient who also showed a decrease in the coronary venous lactate:pyruvate ratio during stimulation. The lactate and pyruvate removal continued in all patients. The stimulation lowered the cardiac output from 3.0 ± 0.2 to 2.6 ± 0.2 L/min/M2, and raised the systemic arteriovenous oxygen difference from 5.0 ± 0.3 to 5.7 ± 0.4 ml/100 ml. The total body oxygen consumption remained the same. The brachial artery mean pressure diminished from 103 ± 7 to 88 ± 6 mm Hg. The heart rate was not significantly different.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American College of Chest Physicians.