Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lester, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lester, W.
(Chest. 1972;61:574-578.)
© 1972 American College of Chest Physicians

The Antituberculosis Efficacy of Rifampin in 136 Patients

Paul T. Davidson M.D.1; Marian Goble M.D.1; and William Lester M.D.1

1 National Jewish Hospital and Research Center, Denver

Table 9 summarizes the results. A total of 136 patients was studied. One hundred and twelve were infected with M tuberculosis. Five of these patients had drug susceptible organisms, and all were successfully treated with rifampin. The remaining 107 patients had drug resistant disease and 103 received definitive therapy. Eighty-four patients received rifampin at least one effective antituberculosis drug: 73 (87 percent) were successfully treated; and 11 (13 percent) failed to show improvement. Of the 19 patients who received rifampin without an effective companion drug, 10 (53 percent) were successfully treated; and 9 (47 percent) failed to respond.

[See pdf for the table]

Twenty-four patients with atypical mycobacterial disease received rifampin-containing drug regimens. Twelve patients with M kansasii infections were successfully treated, and the results were indeterminate in one. Only three of 11 patients with Group 3 infections were successfully treated.

The results of this study indicates that rifampin is a safe and very effective antituberculosis drug. Its proper use, however, includes the fact that, like all antituberculosis drugs, rifampin as a single drug cannot be expected to control cavitary pulmonary disease with an acceptable rate of success. It should always be used in combination with one or more other effective drugs if at all possible. Rifampin-containing regimens were highly successful in treating infections due to M kansasii. Results with Group 3 infections were poor.

The development of rifampin is without a doubt a major advance in the treatment of tuberculosis. Its importance in the retreatment of patients with drug resistant infection is extraordinary. Because of this marked efficacy, it is imperative that the drug be properly used so that emerging resistance will be avoided.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American College of Chest Physicians.