Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Glancy, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Glancy, D. L.
(Chest. 1972;62:175-178.)
© 1972 American College of Chest Physicians

Comparison of Left Ventricular and Pulmonary Arterial Injection Sites in Determination of Cardiac Output by Indicator Dilution Technique

Richard L. Shepherd M.D.1; Lawrence M. Higgs M.D.1; and D. Luke Glancy M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 Section on Cardiovascular Diagnosis, Cardiology Branch, National Heart and Lung Institute, Bethesda, Maryland

Cardiac outputs calculated from left ventricular indicator dilution curves were compared to outputs calculated from pulmonary arterial curves in 58 patients with a variety of cardiac abnormalities. Cardiac outputs calculated from left ventricular and pulmonary arterial curves differed by only 0.037 ± 0.052 L/min. Individual measurements of cardiac output using left ventricular curves had an estimated standard error 0.41 L/min (9.0 percent of output); individual measurements using pulmonary arterial curves had an estimated standard error of 0.35 L/min (7.7 percent of output). Thus, the two methods gave nearly identical values for cardiac output and were equally reproducible. A significant association (P=0.02) was found between mitral regurgitation and dissimilar values for cardiac output determined by the two methods. It is concluded that the site of injection of the indicator does not appreciably influence calculation of cardiac output except in the presence of severe mitral regurgitation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American College of Chest Physicians.