Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grabau, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grabau, A. A.
(Chest. 1973;63:182-184.)
© 1973 American College of Chest Physicians

Comparison of a New Mono-Vacc Tuberculin Test with the Mantoux Test

A. Arthur Grabau M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 Director, Division of Tuberculosis Control, Erie County Department of Health, Buffalo, New York

A new Mono-Vacc tuberculin test using PPD as the antigen was evaluated by comparing it with the Mantoux test (PPD-S, 5 TU), on 2,657 subjects including students, penitentiary inmates, and diagnosed tuberculosis patients. All tests were read 48 hours after administration, with each test read independently without the reader's knowledge of the reaction on the contralateral arm. Results of the tesb were measured in millimeters of induration and are reported in tables as negative, doubtful or positive, according to the size of the induration. Combined results of all groups tested reveal excellent correlation between the two tests with 0.1 percent Mono-Vacc false positives and 1.4 percent Mono-Vacc false negatives, using the Mantoux as the standard test. Advantages of the Mono-Vacc method of testing include ease of administration, a well-defined, single, circular reaction which is easy to read and is generally smaller than that of the Mantoux, and exceptionally good patient acceptance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American College of Chest Physicians.