Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haft, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Fano, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haft, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Fano, A.
(Chest. 1973;63:868-874.)
© 1973 American College of Chest Physicians

Clinical Experience with Ouabain Administered in Small Divided Doses in the Monitored Patient

Jacob I. Haft M.D.1; Ala-Eddin Shahabadi M.D.1; and Alberto Fano M.D.1

1 Cardiac Section, Bronx VA Hospital and Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York

Ouabain was administered intravenously to 117 monitored patients who required digitalization principally for the treatment of atrial arrhythmias with rapid ventricular response and heart failure associated with acute myocardial infarction. The dosage regimen consisted of 0.2 mg initially (or 0.1 mg if the patient had recently received digoxin) followed by 0.1 mg every hour until a therapeutic response had occurred, toxicity developed, or 1 to 1.3 mg ouabain had been administered. Ouabain given according to this schedule allowed the peak effect of previous doses to be observed before further ouabain was given, and theoretically avoided the development of serious toxicity. The therapeutic dose was found to vary widely among individual patients. The mean dose for control of ventricular rate in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter was 0.79 mg in those not previously on digoxin and 0.73 mg in those on digoxin. The mean dose among patients with acute myocardial infarction who appeared to respond to ouabain was 0.50 mg. Ouabain was effective in 93.5 percent of the patients with atrial arrhythmias and 61.3 percent of those with acute myocardial infarction and failure. Toxicity occurred in 26 percent of the patients but was usually mild and consisted mainly of VPCs. The toxic dose was unpredictable and not significantly different from the therapeutic dose. Because very low doses occasionally caused ventricular irritability, ouabain should be used with caution only in patients who are constantly monitored.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American College of Chest Physicians.