Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radner, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radner, D. B.
(Chest. 1973;64:213-216.)
© 1973 American College of Chest Physicians

Toxicologic and Pharmacologic Aspects of Rifampin

D. B. Radner M.D., F.C.C.P.

Experience indicates that rifampin is a semisynthetic antibiotic highly active against mycobacteria, which can be administered orally once daily, resulting in prolonged high blood levels considerably above those needed to inhibit Mycobacterium tuberculosis. There is no cross-resistance to other antimicrobial agents, and it is relatively nontoxic with the proper selection of patients. It is capable of sterilizing lungs and spleens of experimental animals when combiied with isoniazid, opening the door to studies of effective intermittent therapy regimens in tuberculosis. Because of lack of cross-resistance with other drugs used in the treatment of tuberculosis, its obvious place in the therapeutic armamentarium is the treatment of resistant infections and treatment failures when combined with other appropriate drugs. However, the advantage of the more rapid sputum conversion when using regimeus containing rifampin should be an advantage for its use in initial treatment, particularly when resistant organisms are suspected or when there is intolerance or toxicity to other effective drugs. For the present, we have the opportunity to study its long-term actions, interactions with other pharmacologic agents and the best selection of patients for rifampin therapy. Whether its high degree of efficacy when combined with isoniazid will permit shortening of the duration of therapy is much too early to answer. Only long periods of observation in planned control studies will answer that question. The addition of rifampin to our therapeutic regimens in the treatment of tuberculosis will alter the duration of hospitalization, if not the need for it, in more patients. Properly used, it should reduce sharply the number of treatment failures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. J. Sherertz, M. S. Boger, C. A. Collins, L. Mason, and I. I. Raad
Comparative in vitro efficacies of various catheter lock solutions.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2006; 50(5): 1865 - 1868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American College of Chest Physicians.