Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenbaum, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grace, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenbaum, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grace, W. J.
(Chest. 1974;65:188-191.)
© 1974 American College of Chest Physicians

Esophageal Obstruction during Oxygen Administration: A New Method for Use in Resuscitation

Dennis M. Greenbaum M.D.1; John Poggi M.D., F.C.C.P.1; and William J. Grace M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital and Medical Center of New York, New York City

The levels of arterial oxygen tension pressure (Po2) and oxygen saturation in ten apneic dogs were compared after mechanical ventilation using a face mask, endotracheal, and esophageal intubation. The data indicate that ventilation using endotracheal intubation results in a Po2 level nearly double that obtained when ventilation is performed using a face mask or esophageal intubation in healthy experimental subjects. There was a 7.3 percent average increase in Po2 when esophageal intubation was used compared to ventilation using a face mask. However, ventilation with esophageal intubation offers the distinct advantage over ventilation with a face mask in preventing aspiration of regurgitated vomitus. We conclude that endotracheal intubation is the route of choice for ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and that every effort should be made to make available personnel trained in this technique wherever the need for resuscitation is likely, such as in mobile coronary and rescue units. But when this is not feasible, esophageal intubation should be performed to prevent regurgitation of stomach contents and aspiration.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American College of Chest Physicians.