Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deutsch, V.
Right arrow Articles by Neufeld, H. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deutsch, V.
Right arrow Articles by Neufeld, H. N.
(Chest. 1974;65:379-387.)
© 1974 American College of Chest Physicians

Angiocardiography in Constrictive Pericarditis

Victor Deutsch M.D.1; Hylton Miller M.D.1; Joseph H. Yahini M.D.1; Abraham Shem-Tov M.D.1; and Henry N. Neufeld M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Heart Institute, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, and The Tel-Aviv University Medical School

The conventional x-ray film examinations and the angiocardiographic features of 13 cases of constrictive pericarditis are analyzed and compared with those in five cases of pericardial effusion and four cases of congestive cardiomyopathy. The conventional x-ray film examination can contribute to the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis if the following combination of features is present: absent to moderate cardiomegaly with poorly pulsating straightened heart borders, together with left atrial enlargement and signs of pulmonary venous hypertension. The angiocardiographic features described in the literature for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis are confirmed, namely: reflux of contrast material into the dilated inferior vena cava; straightening of the opacified right atrial lateral border; increased thickness of the right atrial extraluminal shadow; straightening of the opacified right ventricular cavity's septal border; and increased pulmonary circulation time. It is stressed that the following signs, not widely appreciated, should prove helpful for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis: (a) not only straightening but concavity of the right atrial lateral border persisting throughout the cardiac cycle; (b) not only straightening but concavity of the septal border of a small right ventricular cavity; (c) a small left ventricular cavity displaying forceful contractions; and (d) a concavity of the parietal border of the left ventricular cavity. It is noted that in our patients, left atrial enlargement and pulmonary venous hypertension were the rule rather than the exception. In our opinion, the above mentioned features may be particularly helpful in the differentation of constrictive pericarditis from pericardial effusion in which the cardiac cavities are of normal size, shape and display normal contractility; or from constrictive cardiomyopathy in which there is dilatation of these cavities with diminished contractions.

Submitted on October 21, 1974
Accepted on October 30, 1974







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American College of Chest Physicians.